Press Release
Ontario Ombudsman provides value, good governance in hard times Annual Report 2008-2009
TORONTO (June 23, 2009) – In releasing his fourth annual report today, Ontario Ombudsman André Marin demonstrates how his office “delivers big value on a small budget,” through efficient, hard-hitting investigations that help make government better.
“At times like these, the value of public services comes into sharp focus,” Mr. Marin says in the report, which reviews his office’s latest investigations and the 16,742 complaints and inquiries received in the past year. “That value must be ensured, not just in terms of how much taxpayers get for their money, but in the quality and effectiveness of the services they receive.”
Mr. Marin’s Special Ombudsman Response Team (SORT), created when he began his five-year appointment in 2005, has had an enormous impact on government policy, he notes, citing such recent cases as the probe of the Special Investigations Unit, as well as earlier investigations that improved newborn screening, the province’s lotteries and the property assessment system. By resolving systemic problems that potentially affect millions of people, SORT’s work helps save money, litigation, trauma and even lives.
“Compare a SORT investigation to a public inquiry,” he says. “We can achieve so much more for so much less. We have helped make systems not only fairer and more effective, but leaner and cheaper by targeting waste, poor performance, duplication, delay and inefficiency.” This represents an evolution of the Ombudsman’s office from a “mere complaints department” to an “architect of good governance.”
This year’s report updates all of these cases, tracking the government’s progress in implementing the Ombudsman’s recommendations. Recurring problems – such as lax enforcement by the Family Responsibility Office or cases where parents of special-needs children are forced to surrender custody to obtain care for them – are constantly monitored and dealt with quickly. “Without question, our systemic SORT investigations have inspired dramatic improvement in the quality of governance that Ontarians are receiving,” Mr. Marin says. “SORT is not a hit-and-run squad. We re-investigate to confirm the progress that is claimed, and we keep the pressure on.” Other watchdog agencies across Canada and around the world are now using SORT’s techniques and expertise to train investigators and conduct systemic probes, he notes.
At the same time, Ombudsman staff continue to resolve thousands of individual complaints, featured in the “Case Summaries” section of the report. Several people had money returned to them that had been wrongly taken by bureaucrats; in other cases, lost paperwork was found, bad rules were fixed and poor decisions were reversed.
Some 2,366 complaints to the Ombudsman had to be turned away, however, because they involved the MUSH sector: municipalities, universities, school boards, hospitals and long-term care homes, children’s aid societies, and police. Ontario continues to lag far behind other provinces in allowing Ombudsman oversight of these areas, which consume the bulk of government spending, Mr. Marin says. “These are areas where thrift, sensible government and good judgment are acutely required, yet the government of Ontario declines our help, and it is costing all of us. We are poised to help and remain hopeful that one day we will be able to do so.”
In the one new area of his mandate – investigating closed municipal meetings – the results since January 2008 have been mixed, Mr. Marin reports. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about closed meetings in all municipalities that have not appointed another investigator (188 to date) – under amendments to the Municipal Act that he describes as “failed.” While most municipalities have been eager to co-operate with investigations and embrace transparency, others have been openly defiant. They are free to choose a “lapdog” investigator if they wish, creating a “patchwork” system of enforcement. “There is no sense in this,” he points out.
Always looking for new ways to engage Ontarians, Mr. Marin has launched the Ombudsman’s Office into the sphere of social media. Video, audio and photos are now available to share at the “Media” section of the Ombudsman’s website, where the public can also post comments and questions. Mr. Marin himself is on Twitter as Ont_Ombudsman, and will answer public questions on Twitter from 1-3 p.m. today. Public discussions and questions are encouraged on the Ontario Ombudsman Facebook page as well. Video from today’s news conference will be available later today on the Ombudsman’s website and YouTube channel.
-30-
Aussi disponible en français
Full report, backgrounders and more are available at www.ombudsman.on.ca
***Sign up for our e-newsletter: thewatchdog@ombudsman.on.ca***
For further information or to arrange media interviews with Mr. Marin, please contact:
Linda Williamson
Director of Communications
Tel: 416-586-3426
lwilliamson@ombudsman.on.ca
Elena Yunusov
Communications Officer
Tel: 416-586-3521
eyunusov@ombudsman.on.ca
Sara McMillen
Communications Officer
Tel: 416-646-8008
smcmillen@ombudsman.on.ca
6 Comment(s)
June 23, 2009
I appreciate the "something for everyone" format of the Annual Report. It really brings home the sense of " we are all in this together".
Random thoughts on MUSH:
In a more serious vein I think the office of the Ombudsman will soon be seen as a breath of fresh air for the entrenched and retrenched power brokers dependent upon MUSH dollars.
Regardless of legislation and related policies they sing their own tunes.
1. sole citizen effort
Investigating a municipal issue myself at one point I had to read all reports and interview those with signed permissions myself to determine if policy or procedure was followed or they were satisfied with the outcome. Even then my individual circumstance was corrected but practice soon reverted to it's past performance.
There is very little public satisfaction at present in the MUSH service area.
2. Payor frustration
The Annual Report is " spot on" in the identification of "governance" as being the head that turns the body. In some board situations you would think it is a family business!
KEY: At the same time I think the "payor" would welcome the role of Ombudsman initially as a separate voice that examines whether "compliance" with any investigative report is managed properly both from the assessment level selection of indicators and measurement of outcomes. I think using the Ombudsman in that context would..... over time ....... "build capacity" within the Ombudsman's office and concurrently within the MUSH sector eventually changing the way inspections are designed performed and monitored.
I agree it is laughable that MUSH currently has " the fox guarding the hen house".
3. the citizen body
Citizens of Ontario really deserve to be treated with the respect they deserve and this can only come if someone at the TMT decision-making level introduces a new, skilled watchdog role.
June 24, 2009
Mr. André Marin's work is impressive. I hear only favourable comments in the media and from my circle of friends about him and his staff. I would like to see Mr. Marin initiate a review of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) with regards to the protection of small investors. From what I know about the subject ( I have been a victim of white collar crime that caused the loss of my retirement funds ), thousands of small investors, mainly seniors, lose their hard earned retirement funds through the malpractices of Finencial Services Firms and Advisors without any reaction from the Regulatory bodies like the OSC. During these hard economic times and the financial crisis, many cases causing terrible harm to Seniors come up to the surface but vanish due to lack of effort/interest on the part of the Regulatory Orgabixations and the inability of investors to pursue their case against the Banks. The Ontario Government and the OSC are not providing the needed protection to invnestors as required by their mandate.
June 25, 2009
Could you please send me only the section of the report dealing with Oshawa council
June 30, 2009
Dear Guardians of government integrity and thrift,
What will it take to enable the Ombudsman to delve into the machinations of "Mush"?
A call I made to the SIU revealed a number of problems still remaining. I do not see how the SIU's investigative unit can do their job until it becomes legally mandatory for the police to write out contentious encounters in their notebooks immediately.
Mr. Marin had a meeting with the SIU on June 2, I would like to know what transpired?
Although it may be legally wrong(in court) to use the previous record of reprimands of the accused officer, it should be available to the SIU investigators.
It seems (I admit it's only a feeling I picked up from reading news reports and from my conversation) but persons labeled with having a mental illness, are a built in excuse for excesses in apprehension.
The last misgiving I had was the SIU thought Swat Teams were confined to the USA when they are actually alive and quite active in Canada.
Ron Dabor Sr.
July 4, 2009
I have tried the 'Contact the Premier' to answer my question, i even suggested he could ask the Leader of the House for help, and i guess it was planned that the public could not reply to his (or proxy} answer through the public web site question page, kind of one sided i think. Anyways, Mr. Marin simple to the point question, and being my ombudsman i hope you could help.
Under provincial parliamentary rules and procedures, must a new tax (all items not previously taxed, re:HST items to now be provincially taxed) be presented to the legislator for readings 1/2/3, debate, and finally voting, to become law?


June 23, 2009
While i really appreciate the good work that the ombudsman is doing on behalf of the citizens of ontario, there is one area of concern which needs to be looked from a humanitarian angle also. Right now it is being looked at from the capitalist angle. That is the role of the FRO to enforce support parents. While this is a noble cause as money is needed for the upkeep of a child but equally important is the fact that there should be an agency that ensures that access is also maintained. I personally feel that the root cause of all the social issues in Toronto and Canada is children growing up without the presence of a father. This is tearing the society apart and not helping the child.
The Children Aid Society, whose role it is to ensure the welfare of the child are mostly run by professional managers and overloaded case workers and in the end the child looses.
Its often too late by the time the child grows up and realizes the same.
On another matter i take offense to the term "deadbeat dad's". There are many dad's who love their kids and this is only a small proportion of them who do not comply and if you do further analysis , you would observe that they themselves had a broken family.
So what is the root cause ? money or a father...i think the answer is obvious. It not all about money. A child needs love and both parents.
Such agencies may actually be doing harm in some cases.